Data protection for private individuals in Switzerland

Messengers

Messengers compared

Last checked: 2 November 2026

Which messenger protects your privacy? The key differences at a glance.

MessengerEnd-to-end by defaultPhone number requiredOpen-source appProvider / seat
ThreemaYesNoYesThreema GmbH, Switzerland
SignalYesYes (no-number sign-up only in paid Android beta)YesSignal Foundation (non-profit), USA
SessionYes (still without forward secrecy)NoYesSession Technology Foundation, Switzerland
WireYesNo (email address)YesWire Swiss GmbH, Switzerland
Element (Matrix)Yes for private chats, not for public roomsNoYesElement Creations Ltd, United Kingdom; server of your choice
WhatsAppYes – content, not metadataYesNoMeta; for Switzerland: WhatsApp Ireland Ltd.
TelegramNo – only “secret chats”YesYesTelegram, United Arab Emirates

The information refers to the default settings. “End-to-end” means that only sender and recipient can read the content – not that no metadata is generated.

Which messenger suits you?

The classification follows verifiable criteria. You will find details and sources on the page of each messenger.

If what matters to you is …these fitCriterion
Switching easily and bringing family and friends alongSignal, Threemaend-to-end encrypted by default, easy to use, groups and calls
Not giving a phone numberThreema, Session, Wire, Element (Matrix)sign-up possible without a phone number
A provider based in SwitzerlandThreema, Session, Wireseat of the responsible organisation
Your own server, e.g. for a company or associationElement (Matrix)server can be self-hosted, open standard
As little metadata as possibleSignal, Sessiondocumented data minimisation

WhatsApp encrypts content end-to-end but collects metadata used within the Meta group. Telegram does not encrypt chats end-to-end by default. For Session, funding is uncertain and forward secrecy has not yet been introduced.

More about each messenger (in German)